Waudby, C. A., Dobson, C. M. & Christodoulou, J. Nature and regulation of protein folding on the ribosome. Trends Biochem. Sci 44, 914–926 (2019).
Chan, S. H. S. et al. The ribosome stabilizes partially folded intermediates of a nascent multi-domain protein. Nat. Chem. 14, 1165–1173 (2022).
Streit, J. O. et al. The ribosome lowers the entropic penalty of protein folding. Nature 633, 232–239 (2024).
Samelson, A. J., Jensen, M. K., Soto, R. A., Cate, J. H. & Marqusee, S. Quantitative determination of ribosome nascent chain stability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13402–13407 (2016).
Cassaignau, A. M. E. et al. Interactions between nascent proteins and the ribosome surface inhibit co-translational folding. Nat. Chem. 13, 1214–1220 (2021).
Jensen, M. K., Samelson, A. J., Steward, A., Clarke, J. & Marqusee, S. The folding and unfolding behavior of ribonuclease H on the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 11410–11417 (2020).
Liu, K., Rehfus, J. E., Mattson, E. & Kaiser, C. M. The ribosome destabilizes native and non-native structures in a nascent multidomain protein. Protein Sci. 26, 1439–1451 (2017).
Wruck, F. et al. The ribosome modulates folding inside the ribosomal exit tunnel. Commun. Biol. 4, 523 (2021).
Kaiser, C. M., Goldman, D. H., Chodera, J. D., Tinoco, I. Jr. & Bustamante, C. The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 334, 1723–1727 (2011).
Duran-Romaña, R. et al. Native fold delay and its implications for co-translational chaperone binding and protein aggregation. Nat. Commun. 16, 1673 (2025).
Waudby, C. A. et al. Systematic mapping of free energy landscapes of a growing filamin domain during biosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9744–9749 (2018).
Bhushan, S. et al. α-Helical nascent polypeptide chains visualized within distinct regions of the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 313–317 (2010).
Deckert, A. et al. Common sequence motifs of nascent chains engage the ribosome surface and trigger factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103015118 (2021).
Knight, A. M. et al. Electrostatic effect of the ribosomal surface on nascent polypeptide dynamics. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1195–1204 (2013).
Tan, R. et al. Folding stabilities of ribosome-bound nascent polypeptides probed by mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303167120 (2023).
Ahn, M. et al. Modulating co-translational protein folding by rational design and ribosome engineering. Nat. Commun. 13, 424310 (2022).
Kudva, R. et al. The shape of the bacterial ribosome exit tunnel affects cotranslational protein folding. Elife 7, e36326 (2018).
Guzman-Luna, V., Fuchs, A. M., Allen, A. J., Staikos, A. & Cavagnero, S. An intrinsically disordered nascent protein interacts with specific regions of the ribosomal surface near the exit tunnel. Commun. Biol. 4, 1236 (2021).
Deuerling, E., Gamerdinger, M. & Kreft, S. G. Chaperone interactions at the ribosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a033977 (2019).
Roeselova, A. et al. Mechanism of chaperone coordination during cotranslational protein folding in bacteria. Mol Cell 84, 2455–2471 (2024).
Kramer, G., Shiber, A. & Bukau, B. Mechanisms of cotranslational maturation of newly synthesized proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 337–364 (2019).
Oh, E. et al. Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147, 1295–1308 (2011).
Streit, J. O. et al. Long-range electrostatic forces govern how proteins fold on the ribosome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.10.637539 (2025).
Requiao, R. D. et al. Protein charge distribution in proteomes and its impact on translation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005549 (2017).
Braselmann, E., Chaney, J. L. & Clark, P. L. Folding the proteome. Trends Biochem. Sci 38, 337–344 (2013).
To, P., Whitehead, B., Tarbox, H. E. & Fried, S. D. Nonrefoldability is pervasive across the E. coli proteome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 11435–11448 (2021).
Evans, M. S., Sander, I. M. & Clark, P. L. Cotranslational folding promotes β-helix formation and avoids aggregation in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 683–692 (2008).
Frydman, J., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P. & Hartl, F. U. Co-translational domain folding as the structural basis for the rapid de novo folding of firefly luciferase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 697–705 (1999).
Plessa, E. et al. Nascent chains can form co-translational folding intermediates that promote post-translational folding outcomes in a disease-causing protein. Nat. Commun. 12, 6447 (2021).
Alexander, L. M., Goldman, D. H., Wee, L. M. & Bustamante, C. Non-equilibrium dynamics of a nascent polypeptide during translation suppress its misfolding. Nat. Commun. 10, 2709 (2019).
Bertolini, M. et al. Interactions between nascent proteins translated by adjacent ribosomes drive homomer assembly. Science 371, 57–64 (2021).
Shiber, A. et al. Cotranslational assembly of protein complexes in eukaryotes revealed by ribosome profiling. Nature 561, 268–272 (2018).
Liutkute, M., Maiti, M., Samatova, E., Enderlein, J. & Rodnina, M. V. Gradual compaction of the nascent peptide during cotranslational folding on the ribosome. Elife 9, e60895 (2020).
Liu, K., Maciuba, K. & Kaiser, C. M. The ribosome cooperates with a chaperone to guide multi-domain protein folding. Mol. Cell 74, 310–319 (2019).
Holtkamp, W. et al. Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time. Science 350, 1104–1107 (2015).
Wales, T. E. et al. Resolving chaperone-assisted protein folding on the ribosome at the peptide level. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 1888–1897 (2024).
Pellowe, G. A. et al. The human ribosome modulates multidomain protein biogenesis by delaying cotranslational domain docking. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 2296–2307 (2025).
Chen, X., Rajasekaran, N., Liu, K. & Kaiser, C. M. Synthesis runs counter to directional folding of a nascent protein domain. Nat. Commun. 11, 5096 (2020).
Cabrita, L. D. et al. A structural ensemble of a ribosome–nascent chain complex during cotranslational protein folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 278–285 (2016).
Burridge, C. et al. Nascent chain dynamics and ribosome interactions within folded ribosome-nascent chain complexes observed by NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 12, 13120–13126 (2021).
Chan, S. H. S., Waudby, C. A. & Christodoulou, J. NMR snapshots of nascent chains emerging from the ribosome during biosynthesis. Preprint at chemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-0lmsp (2022).
Streit, J. O., Chan, S. H. S., Daya, S. & Christodoulou, J. Rational design of 19F NMR labelling sites to probe protein structure and interactions. Nat. Commun. 16, 4300 (2025).
Huang, Y. et al. Environmentally ultrasensitive fluorine probe to resolve protein conformational ensembles by 19F NMR and cryo-EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8583–8592 (2023).
Jackson, J. C., Hammill, J. T. & Mehl, R. A. Site-specific incorporation of a 19F-amino acid into proteins as an NMR probe for characterizing protein structure and reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1160–1166 (2007).
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Krantz, B. A. & Sosnick, T. R. Engineered metal binding sites map the heterogeneous folding landscape of a coiled coil. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 1042–1047 (2001).
Camilloni, C., Broglia, R. A. & Tiana, G. Hierarchy of folding and unfolding events of protein G, CI2, and ACBP from explicit-solvent simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 045105 (2011).
Marchi, M. & Ballone, P. Adiabatic bias molecular dynamics: a method to navigate the conformational space of complex molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3697–3702 (1999).
Paci, E. & Karplus, M. Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 441–459 (1999).
Ahn, M. et al. Amyloid forming human lysozyme intermediates are stabilized by non-native amide–π interactions. Adv. Sci. 12, e03957 (2025).
Wlodarski, T. et al. Bayesian reweighting of biomolecular structural ensembles using heterogeneous cryo-EM maps with the cryoENsemble method. Sci. Rep. 14, 18149 (2024).
Mitropoulou, A. N. et al. The ribosome directs nascent chains through two folding-dependent pathways. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.08.647855 (2025).
Galmozzi, C. V. et al. Proteome-wide determinants of co-translational chaperone binding in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 16, 4361 (2025).
Fowler, S. B. et al. Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: structure of unfolding intermediate revealed by combining AFM, molecular dynamics simulations, NMR and protein engineering. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 841–849 (2002).
Fowler, S. B. & Clarke, J. Mapping the folding pathway of an immunoglobulin domain: structural detail from phi value analysis and movement of the transition state. Structure 9, 355–366 (2001).
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O. & Shaw, D. E. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334, 517–520 (2011).
Wright, C. F., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Randles, L. G. & Clarke, J. Parallel protein-unfolding pathways revealed and mapped. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 658–662 (2003).
Schwaiger, I., Kardinal, A., Schleicher, M., Noegel, A. A. & Rief, M. A mechanical unfolding intermediate in an actin-crosslinking protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 81–85 (2004).
Bhatia, S., Krishnamoorthy, G. & Udgaonkar, J. B. Mapping distinct sequences of structure formation differentiating multiple folding pathways of a small protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1447–1457 (2021).
Radford, S. E., Dobson, C. M. & Evans, P. A. The folding of hen lysozyme involves partially structured intermediates and multiple pathways. Nature 358, 302–307 (1992).
Zaidi, F. N., Nath, U. & Udgaonkar, J. B. Multiple intermediates and transition states during protein unfolding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 1016–1024 (1997).
Schwaiger, I., Schleicher, M., Noegel, A. A. & Rief, M. The folding pathway of a fast-folding immunoglobulin domain revealed by single-molecule mechanical experiments. EMBO Rep. 6, 46–51 (2005).
Khushoo, A., Yang, Z., Johnson, A. E. & Skach, W. R. Ligand-driven vectorial folding of ribosome-bound human CFTR NBD1. Mol. Cell 41, 682–692 (2011).
Clarke, J., Cota, E., Fowler, S. B. & Hamill, S. J. Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway. Structure 7, 1145–1153 (1999).
Duttler, S., Pechmann, S. & Frydman, J. Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. Mol. Cell 50, 379–393 (2013).
Keshwani, M. M. et al. Cotranslational cis-phosphorylation of the COOH-terminal tail is a key priming step in the maturation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1221–E1229 (2012).
Szeto, S. G. Y., Williams, E. C., Rudner, A. D. & Lee, J. M. Phosphorylation of filamin A by Cdk1 regulates filamin A localization and daughter cell separation. Exp. Cell. Res. 330, 248–266 (2015).
Oh, W. J. et al. mTORC2 can associate with ribosomes to promote cotranslational phosphorylation and stability of nascent Akt polypeptide. EMBO J. 29, 3939–3951 (2010).
Lang, B., Streit, J. O., Kriwacki, R. W., Christodoulou, J. & Babu, M. M. Protein dynamics at different timescales unlock access to hidden post-translational modification sites. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.25.661537 (2025).
Urrutia, J. et al. An epilepsy-causing mutation leads to co-translational misfolding of the Kv7.2 channel. BMC Biol. 19, 109 (2021).
Shishido, H., Yoon, J. S., Yang, Z. & Skach, W. R. CFTR trafficking mutations disrupt cotranslational protein folding by targeting biosynthetic intermediates. Nat. Commun. 11, 4258 (2020).
Cassaignau, A. M. et al. A strategy for co-translational folding studies of ribosome-bound nascent chain complexes using NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1492–1507 (2016).
Deckert, A. et al. Structural characterization of the interaction of α-synuclein nascent chains with the ribosomal surface and trigger factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5012–5017 (2016).
Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995).
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. & Shah, V. B. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59, 65–98 (2017).
Schanda, P., Kupce, E. & Brutscher, B. SOFAST-HMQC experiments for recording two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation spectra of proteins within a few seconds. J. Biomol. NMR 33, 199–211 (2005).
Barducci, A., Bussi, G. & Parrinello, M. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 020603 (2008).
Piana, S., Donchev, A. G., Robustelli, P. & Shaw, D. E. Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 5113–5123 (2015).
Piana, S., Robustelli, P., Tan, D., Chen, S. & Shaw, D. E. Development of a force field for the simulation of single-chain proteins and protein–protein complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 2494–2507 (2020).
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).
consortium, P. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations. Nat. Methods 16, 670–673 (2019).
Tribello, G. A., Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Camilloni, C. & Bussi, G. PLUMED 2: new feathers for an old bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 604–613 (2014).
McCoy, A. J., Fucini, P., Noegel, A. A. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for dimerization of the Dictyostelium gelation factor (ABP120) rod. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 836–841 (1999).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Vangunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals—a new molecular-dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald—an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
Melis, C., Bussi, G., Lummis, S. C. & Molteni, C. Trans-cis switching mechanisms in proline analogues and their relevance for the gating of the 5-HT3 receptor. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 12148–12153 (2009).
Tiwary, P. & Parrinello, M. A time-independent free energy estimator for metadynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 736–742 (2015).
Noel, J. K. et al. SMOG 2: a versatile software package for generating structure-based models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004794 (2016).
Best, R. B., Hummer, G. & Eaton, W. A. Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17874–17879 (2013).
Tiana, G. & Camilloni, C. Ratcheted molecular-dynamics simulations identify efficiently the transition state of protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 235101 (2012).
Wang, F. et al. All-atom simulations reveal how single-point mutations promote serpin misfolding. Biophys. J. 114, 2083–2094 (2018).
Tucker, M. R., Piana, S., Tan, D., LeVine, M. V. & Shaw, D. E. Development of force field parameters for the simulation of single- and double-stranded DNA molecules and DNA–protein complexes. J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 4442–4457 (2022).
Hopkins, C. W., Le Grand, S., Walker, R. C. & Roitberg, A. E. Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1864–1874 (2015).
Daura, X. et al. Peptide folding: when simulation meets experiment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 236–240 (1999).
McGibbon, R. T. et al. MDTraj: a modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys. J. 109, 1528–1532 (2015).
Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011).
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
Yang, D. T., Gronenborn, A. M. & Chong, L. T. Development and validation of fluorinated, aromatic amino acid parameters for use with the AMBER ff15ipq protein force field. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 2286–2297 (2022).
Debiec, K. T. et al. Further along the road less traveled: AMBER ff15ipq, an original protein force field built on a self-consistent physical model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 3926–3947 (2016).
van der Spoel, D., van Maaren, P. J., Larsson, P. & Timneanu, N. Thermodynamics of hydrogen bonding in hydrophilic and hydrophobic media. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 4393–4398 (2006).
Luzar, A. & Chandler, D. Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid water. Nature 379, 55–57 (1996).
Solomon, I. & Bloembergen, N. Nuclear magnetic interactions in the HF molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 25, 261–266 (1956).
Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).
Chan, S. et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of co-translational protein folding intermediates on the ribosome. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16601044 (2025).
Chan, S. et al. NMR dataset—Chan et al. 2026: Structures of protein folding intermediates on the ribosome. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19210765 (2026).
Chan, S. shschan/NMR-fit: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15169088 (2025).
Streit, J. julian-streit/RingCurrents19F: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15173797 (2025).