NEW YORK, NEW YORK – AUGUST 23: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during morning trading on August 23, 2024 in New York City. Stocks opened up on the rise ahead of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s remarks at the 2024 Jackson Hole Economic Symposium. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
Getty Images
The private equity landscape is experiencing a fundamental shift in how limited partners (LPs) and general partners (GPs) collaborate on investment opportunities. Co-investments, where LPs invest directly alongside GPs in specific portfolio companies, have evolved from an occasional arrangement to a strategic cornerstone of modern private capital deployment, particularly among family offices and institutional investors seeking greater control and transparency.
The Evolution of LP-GP Relationships
“Co-investments have become a credible and increasingly preferred way for LPs and GPs to engage, particularly when the LP is not already invested in the sponsor’s fund,” explains Misha Vasilchikov, founder of MVV Capital Partners . This observation reflects a broader trend reshaping the industry: investors are deliberately moving away from traditional blind-pool fund structures in favor of targeted, deal-level participation.
The appeal is multifaceted. Co-investments enable LPs to gain exposure to specific industries and opportunities while benefiting from the sponsor’s sourcing capabilities, due diligence infrastructure, and operational expertise. This arrangement proves particularly valuable for investors venturing into sectors where they lack deep domain knowledge but can leverage a trusted GP’s experience and track record.
According to Carta’s analysis of co-investment structures, these arrangements typically involve reduced or eliminated management fees and carried interest compared to traditional fund investments, making them economically attractive for LPs while allowing GPs to deploy larger amounts of capital into high-conviction opportunities.
Institutional Adoption and Strategic Implementation
The institutional embrace of co-investments extends beyond mere preference, for some investors, it represents their exclusive pathway into private markets. Vasilchikov notes that “several large institutions and insurance platforms only invest at the deal level when co-investing alongside a trusted sponsor, rather than investing directly or through commingled funds.” This approach allows these institutions to maintain rigorous investment criteria while accessing opportunities they might not independently source or evaluate.
Major insurance companies have adopted this strategy as their primary private equity vehicle. These institutions recognize that partnering with established sponsors provides both the deal flow and the operational oversight necessary for successful private market investing, without requiring the extensive internal infrastructure needed for direct investment programs.
Carlyle’s AlpInvest, one of the industry’s leading co-investment specialists, raised $4.1 billion for its ninth co-investment fund in 2024, underscoring the robust institutional demand for these structures. This fundraising success demonstrates that sophisticated investors view co-investments not as a supplementary strategy but as a core allocation methodology.
The Family Office Advantage
The co-investment model has found particularly fertile ground among family offices, which have emerged as some of the most active participants in this space. Unlike institutional investors bound by committee processes and rigid mandates, family offices often combine substantial capital with decision-making agility and long-term investment horizons.
As Vasilchikov emphasizes, “many large, highly sophisticated family offices intentionally avoid blind-pool funds and prefer to selectively invest in individual opportunities, making co-investments a natural point of alignment.” This preference stems from several factors unique to family office investing: the desire for transparency into underlying holdings, the ability to align investments with family values or industry expertise, and the flexibility to concentrate capital in high-conviction opportunities rather than accepting the diversification inherent in commingled funds.
Family offices also appreciate the relationship-building aspect of co-investments. By partnering repeatedly with trusted sponsors on specific deals, they develop deeper insights into the GP’s investment process, operational capabilities, and value-creation strategies, intelligence that proves valuable when evaluating future opportunities.
Benefits for General Partners
While co-investments clearly serve LP interests, they also provide meaningful advantages for general partners navigating an increasingly competitive fundraising environment. Vasilchikov notes that “co-investments allow GPs to access pools of capital that are often unavailable through traditional fund structures,” expanding their potential capital base beyond committed fund investors.
This additional capital proves particularly valuable for larger transactions where fund capacity might be constrained, or when GPs identify exceptional opportunities requiring concentration beyond typical fund construction parameters. According to a 2015 Forbes analysis, the rise in LP co-investing activity initially raised concerns about fee compression and reduced GP economics, but the industry has largely adapted by viewing co-investment capacity as a fundraising and relationship-building tool rather than a threat to traditional fund economics.
For sponsors, offering co-investment opportunities strengthens LP relationships, provides a testing ground for potential future fund investors, and demonstrates confidence in specific portfolio companies. The arrangement also allows GPs to maintain or increase their ownership stakes in portfolio companies without over-concentrating their fund capital.
Structural Considerations and Implementation
Co-investments typically operate through special purpose vehicles (SPVs) created for individual transactions, though some sponsors offer structured co-investment funds that invest across multiple opportunities. According to industry fundamentals outlined by Forbes, successful co-investment programs require clear governance structures, aligned economic terms, and well-defined processes for opportunity allocation and information sharing.
The timing and selection process for co-investment opportunities varies by sponsor. Some GPs offer co-investment rights to all fund LPs pro rata, while others reserve these opportunities for anchor investors or those providing additional strategic value. The most sophisticated programs balance fairness with practicality, ensuring that co-investment opportunities reach investors capable of executing quickly while maintaining alignment across the LP base.
Looking Forward
The continued growth of co-investments reflects broader themes in private capital: the demand for greater transparency, the desire for more targeted exposure, and the evolution of LP-GP relationships from purely financial arrangements to strategic partnerships. As family offices and institutional investors alike seek alternatives to traditional blind-pool structures, co-investments provide a framework that serves the interests of both capital providers and sponsors.
For family offices in particular, co-investments represent an ideal entry point into private equity, combining professional management and sourcing with the selectivity and transparency they require. As this segment of the investor base continues to grow in sophistication and capital deployment, co-investments will likely expand their role as a primary, rather than supplementary, approach to private market investing.
The transformation Vasilchikov describes is not merely a tactical shift but a structural evolution in how private capital operates, driven by investor demand for greater control, transparency, and alignment with the sponsors they trust.